Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

Beansy Offline
#1 Posted : Sunday, 7 September 2025 9:51:56 PM(UTC)
Beansy

Rank: Newbie

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/09/2025(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: Adelaide

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Hi all,

I’m chasing some help verifying whether my car is a genuine VH SS HDT Improved.
Here are the key details:

Build date: April 1983

Model: VH8VK69 (Commodore SS Sedan)

Body No: 591806-S (Elizabeth build)

Chassis/VIN: 8K69TC L591806 H

Engine: L31 (5.0L 308ci), number stamped VT38003

Trans: M21 4-speed manual

Diff: GU4 (3.08 LSD)

Trim: 1920-79T (Claret tweed)

Paint: 1F 075-D (Fiery/Flame Red)


Features on the car now:

HDT Improved dash badge

Momo/HDT steering wheel & gear knob

Suspension mods (Pedders Gas Sports Ryder shocks, Whiteline/King springs, thicker sway bars)

Brown Davis drop tank

Engine rebuilt previously with B-cast heads, ACL pistons, late A9L rods (BNB Engines / Terry Wallis Motors)


What I know:

Definitely a genuine VH SS (tags all match).

Previous auction listings described it as HDT Improved.

A few things on it (badge, wheel, suspension, drop tank) aren’t standard SS, so I’m trying to confirm if it went through Bertie Street as an Improved car.


Appreciate any guidance, records, or if anyone here recognises the car or numbers.

Cheers,
Brad
HK1837 Offline
#2 Posted : Sunday, 7 September 2025 10:55:22 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,898

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 555 time(s) in 530 post(s)
Not sure about the car but that engine number is out of a VB.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
justgm Offline
#3 Posted : Monday, 8 September 2025 3:44:17 PM(UTC)
justgm

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/04/2005(UTC)
Posts: 476
Man
New Zealand

Was thanked: 16 time(s) in 15 post(s)
Is the engine number missing a 6th digit ? It is not recorded in the "Brock Bible" as HDT build. Thanks Mark.
life is good in "Wine & Holden Marlborough "
Smitty2 Offline
#4 Posted : Monday, 8 September 2025 4:07:06 PM(UTC)
Smitty2

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/07/2019(UTC)
Posts: 411
Australia
Location: bayside Melbourne

Thanks: 249 times
Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 34 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Beansy Go to Quoted Post
Hi all,

I’m chasing some help verifying whether my car is a genuine VH SS HDT Improved.
Here are the key details:

Build date: April 1983

Model: VH8VK69 (Commodore SS Sedan)

Body No: 591806-S (Elizabeth build)

Chassis/VIN: 8K69TC L591806 H

Engine: L31 (5.0L 308ci), number stamped VT38003

Trans: M21 4-speed manual

Diff: GU4 (3.08 LSD)

Trim: 1920-79T (Claret tweed)

Paint: 1F 075-D (Fiery/Flame Red)


Features on the car now:

HDT Improved dash badge

Momo/HDT steering wheel & gear knob

Suspension mods (Pedders Gas Sports Ryder shocks, Whiteline/King springs, thicker sway bars)

Brown Davis drop tank

Engine rebuilt previously with B-cast heads, ACL pistons, late A9L rods (BNB Engines / Terry Wallis Motors)


What I know:

Definitely a genuine VH SS (tags all match).

Previous auction listings described it as HDT Improved.

A few things on it (badge, wheel, suspension, drop tank) aren’t standard SS, so I’m trying to confirm if it went through Bertie Street as an Improved car.


Appreciate any guidance, records, or if anyone here recognises the car or numbers.

Cheers,
Brad


all these don't make sense ...

Build date: April 1983
Model: VH8VK69 (Commodore SS Sedan)
Body No: 591806-S (Elizabeth build)
Chassis/VIN: 8K69TC L591806 H
Engine: L31 (5.0L 308ci), number stamped VT38003



Elizabeth build with a 'L' tag is ok but ...
Body number has - S ? Isn't Elizabth - A?
Engine number starts with VT.. that code sequence started with VB build (and went until VK LV2 started)
so needs a proper engine number and preferably block casting date too
but
Build plate?.. no details but MUST have XV2
(- SS Commodore Sports Sedan (VH & VK)) following on from VH8VK69 stamping on plate


Club circuit racing...the best fun you can have with your pants on
Beansy Offline
#5 Posted : Monday, 15 September 2025 8:58:58 PM(UTC)
Beansy

Rank: Newbie

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/09/2025(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: Adelaide

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: justgm Go to Quoted Post
Is the engine number missing a 6th digit ? It is not recorded in the "Brock Bible" as HDT build. Thanks Mark.


When looking at this more, yes I did drop a number and also made a typo (apologies) I guess it makes it a tad hard to get help when i give the wrong info... sorry about that

Model -VH8VK69-XV2
Body - 591806-A
Trim - 1980-79T
Paint 1F 075-D
Apr 83
L31, M21 GU4
CVH1040103A
VT380009

on another tag it has the following
8k69TC L591806 H

Appreciate the response Mark.
HK1837 Offline
#6 Posted : Monday, 15 September 2025 9:19:14 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,898

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 555 time(s) in 530 post(s)
That’s better for the engine number.

Notice how consistent GMH were with RPO codes? HQ SS was V8 Belmont sedan with XV2 applied. The next time they used SS for the sports sedan based upon the base vehicle was on VH.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Beansy Offline
#7 Posted : Monday, 15 September 2025 9:31:48 PM(UTC)
Beansy

Rank: Newbie

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/09/2025(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: Adelaide

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Smitty2 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Beansy Go to Quoted Post
Hi all,

I’m chasing some help verifying whether my car is a genuine VH SS HDT Improved.
Here are the key details:

Build date: April 1983

Model: VH8VK69 (Commodore SS Sedan)

Body No: 591806-S (Elizabeth build)

Chassis/VIN: 8K69TC L591806 H

Engine: L31 (5.0L 308ci), number stamped VT38003

Trans: M21 4-speed manual

Diff: GU4 (3.08 LSD)

Trim: 1920-79T (Claret tweed)

Paint: 1F 075-D (Fiery/Flame Red)


Features on the car now:

HDT Improved dash badge

Momo/HDT steering wheel & gear knob

Suspension mods (Pedders Gas Sports Ryder shocks, Whiteline/King springs, thicker sway bars)

Brown Davis drop tank

Engine rebuilt previously with B-cast heads, ACL pistons, late A9L rods (BNB Engines / Terry Wallis Motors)


What I know:

Definitely a genuine VH SS (tags all match).

Previous auction listings described it as HDT Improved.

A few things on it (badge, wheel, suspension, drop tank) aren’t standard SS, so I’m trying to confirm if it went through Bertie Street as an Improved car.


Appreciate any guidance, records, or if anyone here recognises the car or numbers.

Cheers,
Brad


all these don't make sense ...

Build date: April 1983
Model: VH8VK69 (Commodore SS Sedan)
Body No: 591806-S (Elizabeth build)
Chassis/VIN: 8K69TC L591806 H
Engine: L31 (5.0L 308ci), number stamped VT38003



Elizabeth build with a 'L' tag is ok but ...
Body number has - S ? Isn't Elizabth - A?
Engine number starts with VT.. that code sequence started with VB build (and went until VK LV2 started)
so needs a proper engine number and preferably block casting date too
but
Build plate?.. no details but MUST have XV2
(- SS Commodore Sports Sedan (VH & VK)) following on from VH8VK69 stamping on plate





100% right, apologies. I was making notes and flicking in between and left some crucial info out...
Model -VH8VK69-XV2
Body - 591806-A
Trim - 1980-79T
Paint 1F 075-D
Apr 83
L31, M21 GU4
CVH1040103A
VT380009

on another tag it has the following
8k69TC L591806 H

not sure if i read this right, correct me if im wrong, I think the casting number is "11k2"

Thank you for your response.
Beansy Offline
#8 Posted : Tuesday, 16 September 2025 11:11:57 AM(UTC)
Beansy

Rank: Newbie

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/09/2025(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: Adelaide

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
That’s better for the engine number.

Notice how consistent GMH were with RPO codes? HQ SS was V8 Belmont sedan with XV2 applied. The next time they used SS for the sports sedan based upon the base vehicle was on VH.



Getting there... must admit though, the intricacies isn't of the history isn't my strong point, which you've probably already guessed.

Initially, I thought I had a standard vh ss, which im completely happy with, but there are a few other bits on it that made me want to learn more about it.

Appreciate you taking the time to comment.
Cheers
HK1837 Offline
#9 Posted : Tuesday, 16 September 2025 12:52:35 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,898

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 555 time(s) in 530 post(s)
I thought a VH SS was standard with a 4.2? Even the HDT modified Group 1-3. The standard GMH 5.0L or the V5H version were optional depending upon the car.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
 1 user thanked HK1837 for this useful post.
Smitty2 on 16/09/2025(UTC)
Beansy Offline
#10 Posted : Tuesday, 16 September 2025 1:34:48 PM(UTC)
Beansy

Rank: Newbie

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/09/2025(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: Adelaide

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
I thought a VH SS was standard with a 4.2? Even the HDT modified Group 1-3. The standard GMH 5.0L or the V5H version were optional depending upon the car.



This was my original thought as well.
However, there are a few that came out with the 5lt. Happy to be told otherwise, as im sure, there are much more knowledgeable people on this matter then me.


So this, plus a few other bits on the car has lead me to wanting to build out the history. Which I might regret 😀
HK1837 Offline
#11 Posted : Tuesday, 16 September 2025 2:29:38 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,898

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 555 time(s) in 530 post(s)
5.L was optional was what I meant. A standard SS. regardless of if a Group car or not was a 4.2.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Smitty2 Offline
#12 Posted : Tuesday, 16 September 2025 5:59:39 PM(UTC)
Smitty2

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/07/2019(UTC)
Posts: 411
Australia
Location: bayside Melbourne

Thanks: 249 times
Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 34 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
I thought a VH SS was standard with a 4.2? Even the HDT modified Group 1-3. The standard GMH 5.0L or the V5H version were optional depending upon the car.



correct that !

4.2 V8s rule in all VH models.. GMH or HDT with the 5.0 as an option in all too


just gotta find my copy of the HDT build book to see if this is a VH 'Group car or
just a standard SS with some HDT options (aka enhanced)

Edited by user Tuesday, 16 September 2025 6:05:22 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Club circuit racing...the best fun you can have with your pants on
Beansy Offline
#13 Posted : Tuesday, 16 September 2025 10:11:57 PM(UTC)
Beansy

Rank: Newbie

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/09/2025(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: Adelaide

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Smitty2 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
I thought a VH SS was standard with a 4.2? Even the HDT modified Group 1-3. The standard GMH 5.0L or the V5H version were optional depending upon the car.



correct that !

4.2 V8s rule in all VH models.. GMH or HDT with the 5.0 as an option in all too


just gotta find my copy of the HDT build book to see if this is a VH 'Group car or
just a standard SS with some HDT options (aka enhanced)




That would be greatly appreciated Smitty2.

Edited by user Tuesday, 16 September 2025 10:46:21 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Blu253 Offline
#14 Posted : Wednesday, 17 September 2025 2:59:47 PM(UTC)
Blu253

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/01/2025(UTC)
Posts: 33
Australia
Location: Macarthur

Thanks: 25 times
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
That’s better for the engine number.

Notice how consistent GMH were with RPO codes? HQ SS was V8 Belmont sedan with XV2 applied. The next time they used SS for the sports sedan based upon the base vehicle was on VH.


Was the VH XV2 the same basic spec as the HQ XV2?

That is, 4.2, 4 speed, same diff ratio, dual exhaust, 14x6 Sports wheels???
Current daily drivers
VFII Sportwagon SV6; BF Astra RS
In the shed
VH Vacationer Pacific Blue 4.2
Beansy Offline
#15 Posted : Wednesday, 17 September 2025 3:38:21 PM(UTC)
Beansy

Rank: Newbie

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/09/2025(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: Adelaide

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Blu253 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
That’s better for the engine number.

Notice how consistent GMH were with RPO codes? HQ SS was V8 Belmont sedan with XV2 applied. The next time they used SS for the sports sedan based upon the base vehicle was on VH.


Was the VH XV2 the same basic spec as the HQ XV2?

That is, 4.2, 4 speed, same diff ratio, dual exhaust, 14x6 Sports wheels???


Hey Blu253,

No, 5lt with the m21, which i believe is different ratios? and the diff is GU4 LSD, to that of the HQ was an open diff and different ratios?

Currently has HDT Aeros on it. Also, it appear to what im guessing as a group side skirts and rear spoiler put on. Just not sure at what stage this was done. Apparently, it was done from dealership.

As of today, i spoke to the original owner of 30 years today and he noted it was sent back for the HDT enhancements, so not sure what this means or outcome yet. He is going help chase papers up, as he originally also worked at holdens for 50 years.

 1 user thanked Beansy for this useful post.
Blu253 on 17/09/2025(UTC)
Blu253 Offline
#16 Posted : Wednesday, 17 September 2025 3:58:43 PM(UTC)
Blu253

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 12/01/2025(UTC)
Posts: 33
Australia
Location: Macarthur

Thanks: 25 times
Originally Posted by: Beansy Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: Blu253 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
That’s better for the engine number.

Notice how consistent GMH were with RPO codes? HQ SS was V8 Belmont sedan with XV2 applied. The next time they used SS for the sports sedan based upon the base vehicle was on VH.


Was the VH XV2 the same basic spec as the HQ XV2?

That is, 4.2, 4 speed, same diff ratio, dual exhaust, 14x6 Sports wheels???


Hey Blu253,

No, 5lt with the m21, which i believe is different ratios? and the diff is GU4 LSD, to that of the HQ was an open diff and different ratios?

Currently has HDT Aeros on it. Also, it appear to what im guessing as a group side skirts and rear spoiler put on. Just not sure at what stage this was done. Apparently, it was done from dealership.

As of today, i spoke to the original owner of 30 years today and he noted it was sent back for the HDT enhancements, so not sure what this means or outcome yet. He is going help chase papers up, as he originally also worked at holdens for 50 years.



Thanks Beansy, sounds a nice car.

I was more thinking of the basic spec VH SS. It seems to me to be a re do of the HQ pack, but with the ability to build upon it to get to a car like the one you are looking at. 👍🏻

Edited by user Wednesday, 17 September 2025 3:59:28 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Current daily drivers
VFII Sportwagon SV6; BF Astra RS
In the shed
VH Vacationer Pacific Blue 4.2
Smitty2 Offline
#17 Posted : Wednesday, 17 September 2025 5:23:26 PM(UTC)
Smitty2

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/07/2019(UTC)
Posts: 411
Australia
Location: bayside Melbourne

Thanks: 249 times
Was thanked: 34 time(s) in 34 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Blu253 Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
That’s better for the engine number.

Notice how consistent GMH were with RPO codes? HQ SS was V8 Belmont sedan with XV2 applied. The next time they used SS for the sports sedan based upon the base vehicle was on VH.


Was the VH XV2 the same basic spec as the HQ XV2?

That is, 4.2, 4 speed, same diff ratio, dual exhaust, 14x6 Sports wheels???


Nup.. no way guys!

VH XV2 had 4 wheel diskbrakes, (NOT on HQ) 4.2 litre XT5 engine - better heads, HEI and 4BBL Quaddie STANDARD (5.0 if you wanted more power)
HQ only had XT4 253ci engine with 2BBL carb and points ignition

VH has M21 box (as used with 5.0 engine) and 3.08 ratio diff. HQ? ... M20 V8 box and 3.36 diff
Neither diffs had LSDs standard

Similarities?? Both had N10 twin exhaust and 14"sports wheels. VH was alloy, HQ was steel

Edited by user Wednesday, 17 September 2025 5:44:53 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Club circuit racing...the best fun you can have with your pants on
 1 user thanked Smitty2 for this useful post.
Blu253 on 17/09/2025(UTC)
Beansy Offline
#18 Posted : Wednesday, 17 September 2025 5:32:38 PM(UTC)
Beansy

Rank: Newbie

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/09/2025(UTC)
Posts: 8
Location: Adelaide

Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Makes sense Smitty.

If i knew how, I Would have added a photo
HK1837 Offline
#19 Posted : Wednesday, 17 September 2025 7:58:36 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,898

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 555 time(s) in 530 post(s)
Both XV2 are similar, the Torana XV1 was too (Gpack).

The HQ SS was a sporty V8 Belmont sedan. It got the two performance options available, N10 dual exhaust and GV4 3.36 rear axle. It got some items not available on Belmont or V8 Belmont: Fluted guards, Sports steering wheel and console shift. Plus some of the regular options: XS6 buckets, U21 sports dash and N66 Rally Wheels. Plus they were only limited colours. I know it’s not the same thing as a VH SS but it’s essentially the same concept. So was the XV1 Gpack.

Smitty, HQ SS didn’t have an XT4 engine, they weren’t around until HX pilot production began.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2025, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.100 seconds.