Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

2 Pages12>
Tonyl66 Offline
#1 Posted : Friday, 29 July 2016 8:01:27 PM(UTC)
Tonyl66

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 82

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
What bucket seats would have been an option for a HG Belmont ute, fixed buckets or non reclining (tilt forward) or both?
Dr Terry Offline
#2 Posted : Saturday, 30 July 2016 7:45:25 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,022

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 197 time(s) in 180 post(s)
AFAIK it would be fixed back buckets only for a ute.

Recliners were not optional for commercial vehicles & non-reclining tilt forward were coupe only.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
HK1837 Offline
#3 Posted : Saturday, 30 July 2016 7:49:39 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
A50 fixed back buckets. Automatically came with D55 seat separator for HG Belmont ute. HG V8 Belmont ute you could order M21 which removed D55.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Tonyl66 Offline
#4 Posted : Saturday, 30 July 2016 8:22:35 AM(UTC)
Tonyl66

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 30/11/2008(UTC)
Posts: 82

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 1 time(s) in 1 post(s)
Thanks guys
Lingus Offline
#5 Posted : Friday, 23 September 2016 12:27:23 PM(UTC)
Lingus

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 14/09/2016(UTC)
Posts: 32
Australia
Location: Perth

Thanks: 6 times
I've never seen original fitment bucket seats in a HK-T-G Belmont sedan, ute, or van ... do they carry the same trim pattern as bucket seats in a Kingswood of the same series ?
castellan Offline
#6 Posted : Saturday, 24 September 2016 10:43:47 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,606

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Dr Terry Go to Quoted Post
AFAIK it would be fixed back buckets only for a ute.

Recliners were not optional for commercial vehicles & non-reclining tilt forward were coupe only.

Dr Terry


I was only thinking about such not long ago and seen a XB Falcon ute with bucket seats that had a clip setup type behind fitted to the body that un clips to let the seat fold forward to let you get to the jack, now I don't remember it being on my XB GS ute with bucket seats but it must of had the same set up, but you could recline the bucket seats.

I can not remember any Holden ute or p van from EH to HG that came with bucket seats off hand, but how would one get to the jack if it can't be folded forward if it did.
I can't remember any EH to HG with bucket seats unless they were a premier.
My brother had a HR special wagon in 1982 with bucket seats but they were premier bucket seats.

Reclining bucket seats must of came in from HT on I think, I don't remember my sisters HK premier having recline buckets.
I think my HG premier had recline, some how I remember putting the front seats full forward and recline the seats flat to make one big bed like.
HK1837 Offline
#7 Posted : Saturday, 24 September 2016 10:58:47 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
You got to the jack in a Holden ute or van with fixed bucket seats the same way you got to them when they had a bench seat.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Dr Terry Offline
#8 Posted : Saturday, 24 September 2016 11:30:56 AM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,022

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 197 time(s) in 180 post(s)
Yeah, bucket seats in any Belmont (pre-Sandman) was a very rare option.

Bucket seats in Premiers were all over the place.

To my knowledge all EJ, EH & HD Premier had front fixed buckets only with no bench option.

Early HR Prem was the same,, but mid-HR, a front bench seat (without centre fold-down armrest) was made available as an option.

For HK, HT, HG & HQ a front bench seat (with centre fold-down armrest) was made standard, with either fixed or reclining buckets as an option. AFIAK the fixed back buckets disappeared with the 1973 mid-HQ update.

For HJ on, buckets were standard again for Premier.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
400bowtie Offline
#9 Posted : Saturday, 24 September 2016 10:33:28 PM(UTC)
400bowtie

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/09/2009(UTC)
Posts: 37

I've had 2 utes back in the 70's HG belmont 253 sag white with red trim (buckets) gts dash all orginal fitment and HT 308/sag/10 bolt kingswood white black buckets GTS dash all orginal fitment also . wouldn't mind them now
The difference between good and great is the extra effort
HK1837 Offline
#10 Posted : Sunday, 25 September 2016 8:11:36 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
A 5litre 4spd HK-HG Kingswood ute would be a nice one to have, I wish you'd kept it too (or at least sold it to me)! They didn't get GTS dashes though, just the optional sports dash (for want of a better expression). The GTS got 140mph speedo, whereas the sports dash had 120mph. The only non-GTS that I can think of that got the 140mph speedo was HQ Sandman.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
wbute Offline
#11 Posted : Sunday, 25 September 2016 10:52:46 AM(UTC)
wbute

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/01/2010(UTC)
Posts: 1,116

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 17 time(s) in 16 post(s)
Yeah I agree. A factory V8 one would have been cool today. Would Holden have produced many HK/T/G commercials with a V8 and bucket seats etc?
HK1837 Offline
#12 Posted : Sunday, 25 September 2016 12:48:03 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
That sort of car would more than likely be a retail order, and most Holdens built were stock order (like over 75% of them). That is the main reason you don't see them, plus they have been pillaged over the years for parts.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
400bowtie Offline
#13 Posted : Sunday, 25 September 2016 8:05:22 PM(UTC)
400bowtie

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/09/2009(UTC)
Posts: 37

u would be right Bryon 120mph speedo (i think) it was over 40 years ago. The 308 ute was a x mining co vehicle and had done alot of miles so we rebuilt a lot of it and modify it turned out quite quick ( for it time) as some xy/xa gt owners would tell you
The difference between good and great is the extra effort
gm5735 Offline
#14 Posted : Monday, 26 September 2016 9:37:18 PM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
A 5litre 4spd HK-HG Kingswood ute would be a nice one to have, I wish you'd kept it too (or at least sold it to me)! They didn't get GTS dashes though, just the optional sports dash (for want of a better expression). The GTS got 140mph speedo, whereas the sports dash had 120mph. The only non-GTS that I can think of that got the 140mph speedo was HQ Sandman.


The 140mph dash in HT and HG GTS is Part number 7449855. There is also part number 2806822 which also looks like it's 140mph, and listed for column shift auto 161, 186, 253, 307 and 308. I've never seen one, and don't know what vehicle it goes in, but I have seen the box that used to contain one!
HK1837 Offline
#15 Posted : Tuesday, 27 September 2016 6:25:30 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Strange, I've never heard of one or seen one. Even the HQ SS only got a 120mph speedo and I have no idea why the HQ Sandman got a 140mph speedo especially a 6cyl one which would never see 100mph unless it was being towed!
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
castellan Offline
#16 Posted : Tuesday, 27 September 2016 9:21:58 AM(UTC)
castellan

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 1,606

Thanks: 13 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 25 post(s)
Originally Posted by: Lingus Go to Quoted Post
I've never seen original fitment bucket seats in a HK-T-G Belmont sedan, ute, or van ... do they carry the same trim pattern as bucket seats in a Kingswood of the same series ?


It would have to be the same as the Belmont sedan trim.

Thing is that back in the day most ute and vans were base model 161 powered from HR to HG as people would not fork out the extra $56 for the big 186, a lot of money to fork out in the day, it's something like being stung $560 in todays money.

People would fork out for the extra $56 in a sedan for the big six and even fork out $239 for the automatic, hell that makes a HG about the same price as you could get a 308 4 speed manual, well ok you would have to fork out a extra $19 for that privilege = about $190 todays dollars.
F the 186 auto I would say, it would of been a 308 4 speed for me, be it ute van or sedan.
A $190 worth of beer Anxious d'oh! but a 308 Drool Think Angel Shhh Dancing
anonymous Offline
#17 Posted : Tuesday, 27 September 2016 10:35:30 AM(UTC)
anonymous

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/05/2008(UTC)
Posts: 56

Was thanked: 2 time(s) in 2 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
Strange, I've never heard of one or seen one. Even the HQ SS only got a 120mph speedo and I have no idea why the HQ Sandman got a 140mph speedo especially a 6cyl one which would never see 100mph unless it was being towed!


The HQ Sandman speedo, the speed and distance traveled was in kilometres,
the old MPH went out in July 1973 and with it the warranty went from 12,000 miles to 20,000 kilometres
HK1837 Offline
#18 Posted : Tuesday, 27 September 2016 11:36:01 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Castellan is spot on, optional drivelines weren't cheap especially anything that involved imported components. For a HK commercial (July 30 1968 and includes 15% sales tax, note options were dearer on passenger line as passenger cars were subject to 25% sales tax):

L20 (186) over 161 was $49.65.
L23 (186LC) over 161 was $62.77.
L66 (186S) over 161 was $124.60.
M22 (4spd) over 3spd column shift was $145.22 on Belmont (floor shift) and $168.25 on Kingswood (M11 console shift).
PTC1 (L30 (5litre), M35 (auto) and LSD banjo in 2.78 or 3.08 ratio) was $477.79. Plus another $28.10 if you wanted G88 (3.36:1 Salisbury rear axle).
PTC4 (L30, M21, M11 and 3.08, 3.36 or 3.55 LSD Salisbury) was $548.05.

This is on top of the base vehicle pricing (August 14 1968 pricing includes 15% sales tax plus on-roads):

Belmont van $2108.53
Belmont ute $2083.11
Kingswood ute $2164.48.

Plus $12 mandatory option for seat belts on all three models.

That makes a 307 4spd quite an expensive upgrade on a HK Belmont ute. You are looking at a 26% premium for the car over a standard one's RRP price.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
HK1837 Offline
#19 Posted : Tuesday, 27 September 2016 11:37:33 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Originally Posted by: anonymous Go to Quoted Post
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post
Strange, I've never heard of one or seen one. Even the HQ SS only got a 120mph speedo and I have no idea why the HQ Sandman got a 140mph speedo especially a 6cyl one which would never see 100mph unless it was being towed!


The HQ Sandman speedo, the speed and distance traveled was in kilometres,
the old MPH went out in July 1973 and with it the warranty went from 12,000 miles to 20,000 kilometres


Nope. HQ Sandman had mph on it's speedo as did HQ GTS in 1974. It is a 140mph/225kmh speedo (dual scale).
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Dr Terry Offline
#20 Posted : Tuesday, 27 September 2016 12:46:28 PM(UTC)
Dr Terry

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 6,022

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 197 time(s) in 180 post(s)
Originally Posted by: HK1837 Go to Quoted Post

L20 (186) over 161 was $49.65.
L23 (186LC) over 161 was $62.77.
L66 (186S) over 161 was $124.60.
M22 (4spd) over 3spd column shift was $145.22 on Belmont (floor shift) and $168.25 on Kingswood (M11 console shift).
PTC1 (L30 (5litre), M35 (auto) and LSD banjo in 2.78 or 3.08 ratio) was $477.79. Plus another $28.10 if you wanted G88 (3.36:1 Salisbury rear axle).
PTC4 (L30, M21, M11 and 3.08, 3.36 or 3.55 LSD Salisbury) was $548.05.


The bargain in there is the M22 Saginaw over a 3-sp non-synchro (crash box) for $142.25. Or even $28.10 for the Salisbury over the Banjo diff.

Dr Terry
If at first you don't succeed, just call it Version 1.0
Users browsing this topic
Guest
2 Pages12>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.145 seconds.