Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

Login


Take the time to read our Privacy Policy.

4 Pages<1234>
benny Offline
#41 Posted : Wednesday, 6 January 2016 3:11:06 PM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

ok thanks , I will get a torch and my glasses and go and check the numbers and make sure they are correct, the engine didn't come with the car, I bought it separately, thanks again..

Edited by user Wednesday, 6 January 2016 3:12:28 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

benny Offline
#42 Posted : Wednesday, 6 January 2016 4:09:33 PM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

ok heres the numbers ,one of the numbers was wrong,thought the 5 was a 6..skinny tag reads 81837H 519141 says above number general motors holdens pty ltd .. large tag reads HK81837KR-00105-H5 trim 1173-12X paint 568-10846 ..says on top of plate general motors-holdens pty ltd then under that in letters a bit bigger body identification, then in smaller letters under that correspondence must bear these numbers.. down the bottom of large plate has made in Australia and in bottom right corner lion holden emblem with holden written in tiny plaque under it. all the numbers are nice and crisp and are all perfectly stamped at exactly the same depth,looking from the back of the plates..the numbers on the skinny plate are set at a very slight height difference after the H and starting with the 5 being a little bit higher..thankyou for your time.


HK1837 Offline
#43 Posted : Wednesday, 6 January 2016 5:05:12 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
The problem is H519141 is from late 4/68 so cannot be on the same VIN tag as 81837K. I own 81837KR-00002-H5 and its PSN is close to H530000 - it was assembled in the early days of July 1968. The 1st Pagewood GTS327 was red and will be close to mine. Also the K is missing from the numbers.

The problem with 81837KR-00105-H5 is the timeframe for this is around 8/68 but the paint line code is invalid for this timeframe. Plus compounding this 1173-12X wasn't an available combination, on its own not a deal breaker but with the other errors and mismatching the scent of a rat starts to appear.

The chassis number on the firewall may timeframe match one of these tags but I doubt it. You'd want to go looking for all GTS327 body evidence too.

Always be aware of perfectly stamped numbers on GMH tags too. There are a lot of faked tags around.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
benny Offline
#44 Posted : Wednesday, 6 January 2016 6:13:27 PM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

did they ever make mistakes when stamping these plates, maybe the 1 is supposed to be a 4 or a 7,??? it would be good if I could find a Sydney car close to the 105 build to compare plates with..thankyou .
HK1837 Offline
#45 Posted : Wednesday, 6 January 2016 7:49:26 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
GMH Production didn't stamp the PSN part of the VIN plate, it was purposely pre-stamped to avoid errors. Pagewood 105 would be many 10000's away in PSN. The wrong paint line used for Warwick on the body tag for the timeframe of this car is normally another dead giveaway to a faked tag - the good thing is the tag fakers don't know all the info they need to. You'll probably also find inbuilt errors in the body tag if it is a faked one, the people who did these in the USA did this on purpose I think.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
benny Offline
#46 Posted : Wednesday, 6 January 2016 8:17:33 PM(UTC)
benny

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 25/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 156
Australia
Location: melbourne

what can I say, I am shattered by this news,have been chasing up parts for this car for years,thanks for your help in clearing it up..i will concentrate on the other car now which is an Adelaide build.thanks again .
detective Offline
#47 Posted : Wednesday, 6 January 2016 8:31:28 PM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
...should these tags state "General Motors Holdens LTD, or otherwise "General Motors Holdens PTY LTD ?
HK1837 Offline
#48 Posted : Thursday, 7 January 2016 6:03:33 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
Both, except LTD is LIMITED on the first one mentioned. It changes during the 70's.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Warren Turnbull Offline
#49 Posted : Thursday, 7 January 2016 12:20:23 PM(UTC)
Warren Turnbull

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Registered, Veteran
Joined: 10/02/2009(UTC)
Posts: 2,354

Thanks: 2 times
Was thanked: 27 time(s) in 26 post(s)
Its is really disturbing the number of cars like this that are turning up. Image how many there are out there that are not known.

Warren
HK1837 Offline
#50 Posted : Thursday, 7 January 2016 12:48:01 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
I asked Ben about the Mosman Park and V8 HK thing. He reckons there are a few hundred of them, he has engine numbers up into the 30790200's. Mosman Park did assemble some Monaros too apparently too - I was with you Warren, first I've heard of this. Some have come up though, Elizabeth built, Mosman Park assembled like the HK ute described in previous posts. Ben's take on 307P2951 is that if this is a mis-representation of the original engine number for a Mosman Park HK ute chassis number HK43924AP optioned with a 5litre engine, it has to be 30790295 or something like that. It is also possibly a jumbled mess of the GMH stamping and the McKinnon Industries stamping after an engine decking, the original number would have been something like 30790295K0713 given the timing of the Elizabeth body.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
FE327CHEVY Offline
#51 Posted : Tuesday, 12 January 2016 11:14:57 AM(UTC)
FE327CHEVY

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 18
Australia
Location: Victoria

Sorry fellas, been away. It will be useful useless info Eh? to me to know if all the numbers being close together at the top of the block indicates that its a Flint block, making it more likely to be a truck engine and not a Parissien replacement six engine.
HK1837 Offline
#52 Posted : Tuesday, 12 January 2016 1:15:59 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
It isn't a McKinnon casting with the date code there, my guess is almost certainly Tonawanda. Very odd that you have a Tonawanda cast 327 with a McKinnon engine number.

Looks like it may actually be a Flint block, appears to have a little tapped plug in the front of the block just to the right of the engine number.

Edited by user Tuesday, 12 January 2016 1:34:55 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
FE327CHEVY Offline
#53 Posted : Wednesday, 13 January 2016 6:26:39 PM(UTC)
FE327CHEVY

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 8/12/2015(UTC)
Posts: 18
Australia
Location: Victoria

Thanks mate. I am satisfied that it's a truck engine due to blue rocker covers, Flint block, double springs and rotators, etc. Can't wait to get your answer.
detective Offline
#54 Posted : Wednesday, 13 January 2016 9:02:48 PM(UTC)
detective

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 3/01/2013(UTC)
Posts: 307

Thanks: 7 times
Was thanked: 11 time(s) in 11 post(s)
...Jeeez mate .. after about three pages....I think we all might've forgot the question !! LOL
gm5735 Offline
#55 Posted : Wednesday, 13 January 2016 10:29:16 PM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
I believe the 3903352 was only ever cast at Tonawanda. That doesn't preclude it being machined elsewhere however - not common, but not unheard of.
HK1837 Offline
#56 Posted : Thursday, 14 January 2016 5:56:07 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
It may be Tonawanda, just the little oil gallery plug at the front just below the filler tube made me think it was possibly a Flint block, but it may also be a truck thing.

In 1967-1968 there does seem to be specific castings at Saginaw, Tonawanda and McKinnon and in the 1969 rationalization they all seem to become common.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Rusty HQ Offline
#57 Posted : Wednesday, 3 February 2016 6:47:35 PM(UTC)
Rusty HQ

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 26/10/2011(UTC)
Posts: 19

Sorry for the delay. Here's the photo's I could find of my 327 out of my RHD '67 Impala. Can't find the shots of the side casting numbers.












Block:








Heads:





HK1837 Offline
#58 Posted : Wednesday, 3 February 2016 7:27:05 PM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
This one is essentially identical to the earlier one from the thread of FE327CHEVY's:

Tonawanda 352 block assembled by McKinnon Industries.
Canadian 482 heads.
A 5 digit number in the same font preceding the engine assembly code.

Any photos of the intake manifold?
This definitely came from a GMH assembled 1967 Impala? If so I reckon FE327CHEVY's also came from a 1967 Impala or Parisienne.
Do you know which GMH assembly plant assembled the car?

Edited by user Wednesday, 3 February 2016 7:28:47 PM(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
gm5735 Offline
#59 Posted : Thursday, 4 February 2016 12:11:38 AM(UTC)
gm5735

Rank: Member

Reputation:

Groups: Registered
Joined: 16/04/2014(UTC)
Posts: 768
Man
Location: Victoria

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 49 time(s) in 47 post(s)
That tallies with what I understood about the 3903352 block - Tonawanda only.
I thought McKinnon was well and truly up and running with 327 casting by then.
Why would they get blocks from Tonawanda, I wonder?
HK1837 Offline
#60 Posted : Thursday, 4 February 2016 6:17:41 AM(UTC)
HK1837

Rank: Veteran

Reputation:

Groups: Moderator, Registered, Veteran
Joined: 1/03/2005(UTC)
Posts: 14,578

Thanks: 1 times
Was thanked: 481 time(s) in 459 post(s)
According to the info I have McKinnon didn't tool for 327 until 1966 and 307 in 1967. It doesn't say when in these years they started casting and machining either though, but I know the 307's were being cast and machined at McKinnon by 9/67 as I have plenty of early HK 307's cast and machined in September 1967. It is possible these are close to the last of their kind.

Those 3814482 heads are 75cc heads, which means the 1967 engines were about 8.55:1. So now we have plausible explanations for the 4BL low comp 327's power increases:

1966 was 230hp.
1967 was 240hp, increase due to the new Quadrajet.
1968 was 250hp, increase due to the compression ratio hike from just over 8.5:1 to just over 9:1.

It does appear that there were different casting numbers used between the US casting plants (Saginaw and Tonawanda) and the Canadian McKinnon plant up until 1969 when manufacturing was restructured. This is probably why the 3917290 head of the Tonawanda 1968 HK 327 head is a different casting number to the McKinnon HK 307's 3911032 although the heads are identical. Same for the HT manual 350 engines, they got 3947041 heads which look to be the exact equivalent of 3927186 heads, and Tonawanda 3947040 heads are the direct equivalent of Saginaw 3917291.
_______________________________________________________
If we all had the same (good) taste, who would buy all the Fords?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
4 Pages<1234>
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2024, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.128 seconds.